I am awfully
glad that it is Friday night.
One of my
facebook friends posted this article a couple of days ago, titled “This is
Irrefutable Evidence of the Value of a Humanities Education.” I do not like this article.
I would like
to disclaim, right now, about my dislike.
I am obviously a STEM student (that’s science, technology, engineering,
mathematics). I am sure that there are
lots of STEM people who look haughtily down their aquiline noses at humanities
peons and laugh about how there aren’t any jobs in their selected fields.
I am not one
of these people. Do what you’re suited
for: if you hate math, science, engineering, then don’t do them. It doesn’t make any sense, and I don’t care
much one way or the other. Although I
would like a job, so if chemists could file out and to the left… I’m mostly
kidding but let’s be real. The job
market in the hard sciences is often not much more promising than the
humanities. Joke’s on us.
I think
there’s very real value in many of the humanities fields, and I would never
condemn anyone’s choice to not do science.
But this
article starts out with a quote that says “you shouldn’t enter college worried
about what you will do when you exit.”
And I just think that’s wrong. I
think that if you’re going to make that substantial financial investment,
especially if it’s promising to leave you hopelessly buried in student debt,
you should have some sort of exit strategy!
You absolutely should worry about what you will do when you exit. I suppose you do have four years to figure it
out, but I’d think it would be high priority.
And then
there’s a list of “10 highly successful people… who prove that humanities
majors are anything but useless”, and I’m thinking, hey, great! We’re going to find logical career
trajectories for humanities degrees!
This is nice!
The list comprises
a politician, four people in the entertainment industry (two talk show hosts,
one writer, one screenwriter), three CEOs, an entrepreneur, and the founder of
CNN.
In terms of
utility of this list, let’s strike Spielberg, Rowling, Conan and Jon Stewart. They all made it big. They made it big with raw talent. Their degrees probably helped them make it
big, but let’s be reasonable: “I’m going to go into the entertainment industry”
is just not a recipe for widespread success.
How many liberal arts degrees have failed in the same venture? (I don’t know, but I’m gonna say a lot – I
don’t like those odds).
So we’re
down to six. Well, we can disqualify
Romney and Blankfein on the basis of their law degrees, both from Harvard. Romney also has a business degree from
Harvard. Carly Fiorina has an MBA (UM)
and a MS in business (MIT), so we’ll strike her. Jamie Dimon has an MBA from Harvard, so we’ll
strike him. It’s really not fair to laud
the so-called useless degree for these successes. It is fair and also great to talk about how
it sets you up beautifully for the graduate degree, but that’s not what’s happening
here…!
And now we’re
left with the Flickr co-founder (MPhil), who I would argue definitely counts
toward the purpose of the list, and Ted Turner who founded CNN and did it without
the graduate degree.
I’m actually
not sure what the explicit purpose of the list was. You can cherry-pick 10 incredibly successful
people using any metric you want, probably.
I just don’t think that this was a particularly useful exercise in
positive thought for struggling humanities majors. It would be more reasonable to show some
career paths / strategies / trajectories for which the humanities degree is
particularly useful and how there’s room to climb the corporate ladder.
At the end
of the day, though, there are far too many students majoring in subjects
without real future plans or career options, and – this is the kicker – racking
up enormous debt to do so. It seems so futile
to me.
And I still
don’t think there’s anything wrong with the humanities. I just think that it, as does anything else,
requires some planning in order for it to pay out eventually. And that you learn some critical skills in
humanities classes.
The article
still seems really vapid. When people
get defensive about not being in STEM, it makes me feel defensive about being
in STEM. Weird phenomenon.
This has been an exquisitely boring and probably offensive post.
This has been an exquisitely boring and probably offensive post.